11-13-20-LONGWave - NOVEMBER - Never Was Gridlock Been More Important - Newsletter-2-Russell 2000 v 1000-POST COVER
,

 

Gordon T Long

Gordon T Long

Global Macro Research | Macro-Technical Analysis 

TIPPING POINTS

GEO-POLITICAL EVENT

 

ELECTION FRAUD: WILL THIS BE A MACRO “SHOCK” EVENT?

 
VOTER FRAUD OR SIMPLY A DELUSIONAL TRUMP?
 
Football fans have all observed that when a team thinks it ‘got away’ with a referee’s call or suspects the call may be overturned by replays appearing on the stadium’s videotron, the priority is to get their next play off as urgently as possible … before the opponent has an opportunity to throw their red flag on the field!
 
That is precisely what Big Media – Big Tech and Big Money did by declaring Biden “President-Elect”, while votes were still being counted, legal suits were being filed, hundreds of avadavats of fraud were being sworn and further evidence of potential systemic fraud being gathered.
LONGWave - 11-11-20 - NOVEMBER - Never Was Gridlock Been More Important!
 
Subsequently, we now witness a media blackout, aided and abetted by social media censorship suppressing the public from hearing the magnitude of just how the first US Presidential “mail-in ballot” election was “gamed”.
 
The situation has become so manipulated that it is no longer about who won an election race,
but now critically more importantly whether the US electoral process is actually fair and just?
 
I will briefly lay out factually where the problems have been discovered, but first let me explain how our brilliant Constitutional forefathers prevented US elections from being stolen through possible nefarious means. Rigged elections is an old game that our Constitutional Framers gave a lot of consideration to.
 
THE RULE OF LAW
 
Everyone needs appreciate how our election process works through state and federal law, not media reporting. The media cannot, nor does decide who wins. The media can simply project who they think might win based on vote totals at any given time. Unless a candidate formally concedes prior to December 14th, the election remains in play and follows a structured predetermined electoral process to resolve disputes enabling fairness & justice:
 
    • The election occurs in early November.
    • Votes are tallied while officials from both parties (Democrat and GOP) are present.
    • Provided officials from both parties are present during the vote tallies and there are:
    • No credible accusations of fraud.
    • No software glitches.
    • Then the vote tallies are ratified.
    • If the vote margin between winner and loser is 0.5% or smaller, an automatic recount is required.
    • If the margin between the winner and loser is larger than 0.5%, but either candidate (or a 3rd candidate for that matter) wants to dispute the results, he or she can pay to have a recount performed. The cost if roughly $3 million per state.
    • Once the recount is completed, or if a recount is not necessary, the individual states formally declare the winner on December 14th when they officially cast their electoral college votes for him or her.
    • If there is any outstanding disputes at that time, the states legislative body selects the states electoral college “electors’.
    • In early January of the next year, the new congress meets to count the electoral college votes and formally declare the winner.
    • If there are disputes still outstanding (for example before the Supreme Court) then the House votes on the selection of the President. The vote in House is taken by state NOT by congressman, with each state casting a single vote. For example, currently there are elected congressman that can be grouped into representing 28 Republican and 22 Democrat states in the People’s Congressional House
    • The new President is sworn into office on January 20th.
    • This is how Presidential elections work in the U.S. under the US Constitution. It would take an act of Congress (Senate & House) to change this.
So where are we in terms of the 2020 Presidential election?
 
For starters, the races in multiple states (Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Arizona) are under litigation or sufficiently close to require mandatory recounts (within a margin of 0.5%). Here is the schedule that must be met without possible exception or delay
 
OBVIOUS AUDITOR/FORENSIC RED FLAGS
 
An auditor or Forensic Accounting analyst typically starts by looking for obvious red flags which would direct their initial investigative efforts. Many “red flags” are blatantly evident in the US Election. I list below just a sampling that were evident immediately following election night, before literally hundreds of whistleblowers came forward to file avadavats of fraud, report observations to the FBI or election officials, and some to just any source they felt might might lead to justice.
 
    • All allegations of voter fraud are against only one candidate. Not from and at both sides.
    • Massive turn out of over 90% in a single polling center is a red flag,
    • Official & Legal Poll observers being removed or not allowed to do their job,
    • The counters cheering as GOP observers are removed,
    • The fact that the dem observers outnumber the GOP observers 3 to 1, red flag,
    • The electioneering at the polls (on video).
    • The late night spikes that were enough to close all the Trump leads are a red flag.
    • The statistically impossible breakdown of the ratios of these vote dumps is a red flag,
    • The ratios of these dumps being far better than the percentages in the bluest of blue cities, even though the historical data does not match is a red flag.
    • The ratios of these vote dumps favoring Biden more in these few battlegrounds than the ratio for the rest of the country (even the bluest of the blue) red flag.
    • The video of 2 AM deliveries of what appear to be boxes of ballots with no chain of custody or other observers right before the late night miracle spikes,
    • Biden outperforming Obama among these few urban vote dumps, even though Trump picked up points in every demographic group in the rest of the country.
    • USPS whistleblower reporting to the Inspector General that they were ordered to backdate ballots to a prior day.
    • The willful violation of the court order requiring the separation of ballots by type,
 
The mainstream media after declaring Biden, President-Elect have conspicuously and suspiciously stopped reporting any and all reports or legal filings (except by ‘headlining’ any denied by the courts).
 
Overall, it is surfacing that though a well crafted “gaming” of the election was obviously in place (primarily centered on mail-in ballots) something surprising went awry on election night. Trump was found to be leading by commanding margins near midnight in many battleground states. It appears that suspiciously the idea concurrently emerged in almost all battleground states that something had to be done to counter this surge. The solution in their strongly democratically controlled city centers was to stop all counting; to expectantly send ballot counters home; then to “drop” or process large quantities of ballots in the dead of night before counters returned in the early morning or the media resumed coverage.
 
This turns out to be the possible fatal mistake of a complex and well crafted theft of a US election that suddenly went terrible wrong. Fortunately, it left an unmistakable trail of what appears undeniable evidence. (See Addendum Below). Whether the evidence stands up in court and changes the election outcome, time can only tell. More importantly we had a glimse into to the murky & highly suspicious irregularities of election malfeasance (I list these in the Addendum)
 
CONCLUSION
 
The chart to the right is the hard reality at the moment, whether you are a “Euphoric” Democrat or a “Despondent” Republican!
 
Assuming Biden has rightfully & fairly won the US election, it frankly would have been in his and the countries best interest for him to ensure a clear accounting of all election disputes in which to validate the integrity of the election process PRIOR to rushing his acceptance speech. He chose not to!
 
By taking an more open approach it would have gone a long way in satisfying an already angry 71M Trump voters believing the election was in fact not fair and just and in fact being stolen. This is not like the football game we mentioned earlier, where you rush the next play before a “challenger” can throw a red flag on the field. This is exactly what should be concerning us all regarding the grey states to the right and the US Presidential election overall.
 
The Issue we need to focus on is not who won the election. The issue is whether the US electorate can be completely satisfied that the election was fair and held within a framework of solid constitutionally integrity. A process which ensures ALL Americas can trust the result.
Without this neither President can successfully govern an entire and united nation!
 

FOLLOWING DETAILED ANALYSIS IS SUBSCRIBER CONTENT ONLY

Subscribe to view full post content with supporting live charts
SUBSCRIBE
 

FAIR USE NOTICE  This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.  If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

NOTICE  Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. MATASII.com does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility.

Gordon Long

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Material is pulled from PUBLIC CONTENT and is used to further support analysis and opinions. All material is sourced, linked, and credit is given to original sources. We make no claims to material pulled from PUBLIC CONTENT. We are NOT AFFILIATED in any way with any sources or any PUBLIC SOURCED material that is used.

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.